↓ Skip to main content

GATA3 in Renal Neoplasms: Increased Utility and Potential Pitfalls

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Surgical Pathology, May 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
GATA3 in Renal Neoplasms: Increased Utility and Potential Pitfalls
Published in
International Journal of Surgical Pathology, May 2023
DOI 10.1177/10668969231177883
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mahmut Akgul, Ankur R. Sangoi, Sean R. Williamson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2023.
All research outputs
#17,352,363
of 25,463,724 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Surgical Pathology
#429
of 990 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#225,002
of 389,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Surgical Pathology
#19
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,463,724 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 990 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 389,616 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.