You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Dietary interventions and precision nutrition in cancer therapy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Trends in Molecular Medicine, May 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.molmed.2023.04.004 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carlos Martínez-Garay, Nabil Djouder |
| Abstract |
In recent years dietary interventions have become a promising tool in cancer treatment and have demonstrated a powerful ability to alter metabolism and tumor growth, development, and therapeutic response. However, because the mechanisms underlying dietary therapeutics are poorly understood, they are frequently ignored as a potential line of treatment for cancer. We discuss the proposed mechanisms behind the anticancer effects of various diets and their development for clinical use. This review aims to provide researchers and clinicians in the field of oncology with a complete overview of the contemporary landscape of nutritional interventions and precision nutrition as cancer therapeutics, and offers a perspective on the steps necessary to establish nutritional interventions as a standard line of treatment. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 103 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 9 | 9% |
| Mexico | 9 | 9% |
| United States | 4 | 4% |
| Peru | 3 | 3% |
| Chile | 3 | 3% |
| Ecuador | 2 | 2% |
| India | 2 | 2% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Unknown | 59 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 79 | 77% |
| Scientists | 14 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 49 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 12% |
| Researcher | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 16% |
| Unknown | 22 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 26 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 159. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2023.
All research outputs
#260,967
of 25,734,859 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Molecular Medicine
#21
of 1,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,777
of 391,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Molecular Medicine
#1
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,734,859 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,959 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 391,793 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.