↓ Skip to main content

Transcriptional coactivation by EHMT2 restricts glucocorticoid-induced insulin resistance in a study with male mice

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, May 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Transcriptional coactivation by EHMT2 restricts glucocorticoid-induced insulin resistance in a study with male mice
Published in
Nature Communications, May 2023
DOI 10.1038/s41467-023-38584-5
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The classical dogma of glucocorticoid-induced insulin resistance is that it is caused by the transcriptional activation of hepatic gluconeogenic and insulin resistance genes by the glucocorticoid receptor (GR). Here, we find that glucocorticoids also stimulate the expression of insulin-sensitizing genes, such as Irs2. The transcriptional coregulator EHMT2 can serve as a transcriptional coactivator or a corepressor. Using male mice that have a defective EHMT2 coactivation function specifically, we show that glucocorticoid-induced Irs2 transcription is dependent on liver EHMT2's coactivation function and that IRS2 play a key role in mediating the limitation of glucocorticoid-induced insulin resistance by EHMT2's coactivation. Overall, we propose a model in which glucocorticoid-regulated insulin sensitivity is determined by the balance between glucocorticoid-modulated insulin resistance and insulin sensitizing genes, in which EHMT2 coactivation is specifically involved in the latter process.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 1 17%
Unknown 5 83%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 1 17%
Unknown 5 83%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2023.
All research outputs
#23,432,544
of 26,106,015 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#57,645
of 59,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#339,306
of 397,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#1,924
of 2,034 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,106,015 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 59,804 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,058 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,034 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.