Who should judge treatment effects as unimportant?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Physiotherapy (Australian Physiotherapy Association), May 2023

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs: 1 blog
twitter: 99 X users
facebook: 2 Facebook pages

guideline: 1 clinical guideline source
podcasts: 1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley: 23 Mendeley

So far, Altmetric has seen 133 X posts from 99 X users, with an upper bound of 412,637 followers.

Who should judge treatment effects as unimportant? https://t.co/9Cdd5UBpEg

While I was writing these tweets I remember a nice paper that add more dimensions to the conversations, such as patient involvement in judging effects as important. https://t.co/XdZ5eZIZVv

Did you know?🤔 Research assists in supporting clinical decisions However… Does research ‘truly’ provide appropriate data & unbiased analysis to recommend ✅ or ❌ of interventions? Who decides what is clinically meaningful? 👀 Nice read ⤵️ http…

RT @ChadDKollas: Notably, the review's lead author, @CAbdelshaheed, has argued that "the smallest worthwhile effect" is an individualized d…

This page shows the most recent X posts that mention this research output. Click here to find out how to access more activity, including 129 additional X posts.