You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Morphological and molecular clue resolves confusion in Pisodonophis boro complex with re-description of Pisodonophis boro (Hamilton 1822) from type locality and description of a new species from India
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Marine Biodiversity, May 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12526-023-01339-y |
| Authors |
Swarup Ranjan Mohanty, Rajesh Kumar Behera, Smrutirekha Acharya, Lipika Patnaik, Dipanjan Ray, Jaya Kishor Seth, Shesdev Patro, Subhrendu S. Mishra, Anil Mohapatra |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 2 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 234. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2023.
All research outputs
#145,552
of 23,913,510 outputs
Outputs from Marine Biodiversity
#6
of 585 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,659
of 204,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marine Biodiversity
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,913,510 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 585 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,797 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them