↓ Skip to main content

Rapid Changes in the Hydrologic Cycle of the Tropical Atlantic During the Last Glacial

Overview of attention for article published in Science, December 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
571 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Rapid Changes in the Hydrologic Cycle of the Tropical Atlantic During the Last Glacial
Published in
Science, December 2000
DOI 10.1126/science.290.5498.1947
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Sedimentary time series of color reflectance and major element chemistry from the anoxic Cariaco Basin off the coast of northern Venezuela record large and abrupt shifts in the hydrologic cycle of the tropical Atlantic during the past 90,000 years. Marine productivity maxima and increased precipitation and riverine discharge from northern South America are closely linked to interstadial (warm) climate events of marine isotope stage 3, as recorded in Greenland ice cores. Increased precipitation at this latitude during interstadials suggests the potential for greater moisture export from the Atlantic to Pacific, which could have affected the salinity balance of the Atlantic and increased thermohaline heat transport to high northern latitudes. This supports the notion that tropical feedbacks played an important role in modulating global climate during the last glacial period.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 571 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 11 2%
Brazil 6 1%
Germany 4 <1%
India 3 <1%
Jamaica 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Other 8 1%
Unknown 532 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 128 22%
Researcher 118 21%
Student > Master 67 12%
Student > Bachelor 41 7%
Professor 36 6%
Other 113 20%
Unknown 68 12%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 330 58%
Environmental Science 70 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 7%
Arts and Humanities 8 1%
Social Sciences 8 1%
Other 19 3%
Unknown 95 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2011.
All research outputs
#8,820,267
of 26,187,546 outputs
Outputs from Science
#51,912
of 82,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,572
of 114,884 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#159
of 240 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,187,546 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 82,480 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.9. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,884 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 240 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.