↓ Skip to main content

Disabling musculoskeletal pain in working populations: Is it the job, the person, or the culture?

Overview of attention for article published in Pain (03043959), June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
5 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
364 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Disabling musculoskeletal pain in working populations: Is it the job, the person, or the culture?
Published in
Pain (03043959), June 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.pain.2013.02.008
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To compare the prevalence of disabling low back pain (DLBP) and disabling wrist/hand pain (DWHP) among groups of workers carrying out similar physical activities in different cultural environments, and to explore explanations for observed differences, we conducted a cross-sectional survey in 18 countries. Standardised questionnaires were used to ascertain pain that interfered with everyday activities and exposure to possible risk factors in 12,426 participants from 47 occupational groups (mostly nurses and office workers). Associations with risk factors were assessed by Poisson regression. The 1-month prevalence of DLBP in nurses varied from 9.6% to 42.6%, and that of DWHP in office workers from 2.2% to 31.6%. Rates of disabling pain at the 2 anatomical sites covaried (r = 0.76), but DLBP tended to be relatively more common in nurses and DWHP in office workers. Established risk factors such as occupational physical activities, psychosocial aspects of work, and tendency to somatise were confirmed, and associations were found also with adverse health beliefs and group awareness of people outside work with musculoskeletal pain. However, after allowance for these risk factors, an up-to 8-fold difference in prevalence remained. Systems of compensation for work-related illness and financial support for health-related incapacity for work appeared to have little influence on the occurrence of symptoms. Our findings indicate large international variation in the prevalence of disabling forearm and back pain among occupational groups carrying out similar tasks, which is only partially explained by the personal and socioeconomic risk factors that were analysed.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 364 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Colombia 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Sri Lanka 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 354 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 53 15%
Student > Bachelor 38 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 10%
Researcher 29 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 7%
Other 91 25%
Unknown 91 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 88 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 59 16%
Psychology 21 6%
Engineering 19 5%
Social Sciences 14 4%
Other 55 15%
Unknown 108 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2022.
All research outputs
#5,065,956
of 34,526,284 outputs
Outputs from Pain (03043959)
#2,480
of 8,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,363
of 240,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pain (03043959)
#29
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,526,284 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,019 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,868 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.