You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparative efficacy of therapies for relapsing multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research, June 2023
|
| DOI | 10.57264/cer-2023-0016 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Imtiaz A Samjoo, Christopher Drudge, Sarah Walsh, Santosh Tiwari, Róisín Brennan, Ibolya Boer, Dieter A Häring, Luisa Klotz, Nicholas Adlard, Judit Banhazi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 7 | 18% |
| United States | 3 | 8% |
| Chile | 2 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Czechia | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 21 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 26 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 15% |
| Scientists | 5 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 17% |
| Other | 4 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
| Librarian | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 14% |
| Unknown | 8 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 17% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 14% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 10% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 14% |
| Unknown | 10 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,099,129
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research
#14
of 832 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,135
of 387,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research
#1
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 832 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 387,810 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.