↓ Skip to main content

Simulations of AGN jets: magnetic kink instability versus conical shocks

Overview of attention for article published in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
19 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Simulations of AGN jets: magnetic kink instability versus conical shocks
Published in
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, May 2017
DOI 10.1093/mnras/stx1165
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 27%
Researcher 9 24%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Professor 2 5%
Student > Master 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 10 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 25 68%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Unknown 10 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 150. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2022.
All research outputs
#312,144
of 28,832,041 outputs
Outputs from Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
#514
of 41,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,733
of 333,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
#18
of 752 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,832,041 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 41,870 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,439 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 752 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.