You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Indirect Effects of Early Shared Reading and Access to Books on Reading Vocabulary in Middle Childhood
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Studies of Reading, June 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1080/10888438.2023.2220846 |
| Authors |
Sinead McNally, Kathryn A. Leech, Kathleen H. Corriveau, Michael Daly |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 14 | 41% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 9% |
| Guyana | 1 | 3% |
| Finland | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 59% |
| Scientists | 9 | 26% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lecturer | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 6% |
| Researcher | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 19 | 59% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 4 | 13% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 19 | 59% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,489,064
of 25,753,031 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Studies of Reading
#39
of 365 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,242
of 391,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Studies of Reading
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,753,031 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 365 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 391,822 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.