You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Virus-associated White Spot Syndrome of Shrimp in Taiwan : A Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Fish pathology, January 1998
|
| DOI | 10.3147/jsfp.33.365 |
| Authors |
Chu-Fang Lo, Guang-Hsiung Kou |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 73 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 4% |
| Professor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 14% |
| Unknown | 23 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 29 | 37% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 12% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 6% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 25 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2019.
All research outputs
#5,583,444
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Fish pathology
#8
of 155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,248
of 95,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fish pathology
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 155 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,728 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.