You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
ため池及びその周辺における日本固有種ニホンイシガメの生息に影響を及ぼす環境要因の推定
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Transactions of The Japanese Society of Irrigation, Drainage and Rural Engineering, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.11408/jsidre.89.i_19 |
| Authors |
谷口 真理, 佐藤 由佳, 角道 弘文 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 3 | 43% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2023.
All research outputs
#7,436,652
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Transactions of The Japanese Society of Irrigation, Drainage and Rural Engineering
#4
of 35 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#176,889
of 534,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Transactions of The Japanese Society of Irrigation, Drainage and Rural Engineering
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one scored the same or higher as 31 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 534,697 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them