↓ Skip to main content

Application of the Theory of Planned Behaviour to two dietary behaviours: Roles of perceived control and self‐efficacy

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Health Psychology, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
286 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Application of the Theory of Planned Behaviour to two dietary behaviours: Roles of perceived control and self‐efficacy
Published in
British Journal of Health Psychology, December 2010
DOI 10.1348/135910700168810
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 286 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
United States 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 280 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 56 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 15%
Student > Bachelor 33 12%
Researcher 23 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 4%
Other 46 16%
Unknown 74 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 64 22%
Business, Management and Accounting 44 15%
Social Sciences 24 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 4%
Other 53 19%
Unknown 79 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2011.
All research outputs
#10,291,846
of 29,684,055 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Health Psychology
#663
of 978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,849
of 214,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Health Psychology
#89
of 175 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,684,055 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.9. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,563 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 175 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.