You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society Consensus Guidelines for Emergency Laparotomy Part 3: Organizational Aspects and General Considerations for Management of the Emergency Laparotomy Patient
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
World Journal of Surgery, June 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00268-023-07039-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carol J. Peden, Geeta Aggarwal, Robert J. Aitken, Iain D. Anderson, Angie Balfour, Nicolai Bang Foss, Zara Cooper, Jugdeep K. Dhesi, W. Brenton French, Michael C. Grant, Folke Hammarqvist, Sarah P. Hare, Joaquim M. Havens, Daniel N. Holena, Martin Hübner, Carolyn Johnston, Jeniffer S. Kim, Nicholas P. Lees, Olle Ljungqvist, Dileep N. Lobo, Shahin Mohseni, Carlos A. Ordoñez, Nial Quiney, Catherine Sharoky, Richard D. Urman, Elizabeth Wick, Christopher L. Wu, Tonia Young-Fadok, Michael J. Scott |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 17 | 30% |
| United States | 4 | 7% |
| Spain | 3 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Denmark | 1 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Czechia | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 23 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 35 | 61% |
| Scientists | 10 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 10% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 17% |
| Unknown | 17 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 31% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 17 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2024.
All research outputs
#854,263
of 25,711,194 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgery
#62
of 4,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,385
of 388,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgery
#2
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,194 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,614 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 388,255 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.