↓ Skip to main content

Getting Through to Circadian Oscillators: Why Use Constant Routines?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biological Rhythms, February 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#45 of 752)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
256 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Getting Through to Circadian Oscillators: Why Use Constant Routines?
Published in
Journal of Biological Rhythms, February 2002
DOI 10.1177/074873002129002294
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 256 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Norway 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 246 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 20%
Student > Bachelor 41 16%
Researcher 33 13%
Student > Master 24 9%
Professor 12 5%
Other 37 14%
Unknown 59 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 49 19%
Psychology 31 12%
Neuroscience 24 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 8%
Other 37 14%
Unknown 70 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2018.
All research outputs
#680,220
of 26,316,852 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biological Rhythms
#45
of 752 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#770
of 132,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biological Rhythms
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,316,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 752 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,259 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them