↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating antimicrobial duration for Gram‐negative bacteremia in patients with neutropenia due to hematologic malignancy or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Overview of attention for article published in Transplant Infectious Disease, June 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 1,402)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
179 X users

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluating antimicrobial duration for Gram‐negative bacteremia in patients with neutropenia due to hematologic malignancy or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
Published in
Transplant Infectious Disease, June 2023
DOI 10.1111/tid.14085
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nischal Ranganath, Zachary A. Yetmar, Audrey R. McCandless, Christina G. Rivera, Brian D. Lahr, Aaron J. Tande, Aditya S. Shah

Abstract

In the management of Gram-negative bloodstream infection (GN-BSI), short antimicrobial courses have been increasingly demonstrated to be non-inferior to prolonged therapy, with lower risk of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) and emergence of multi-drug resistant (MDR) organisms. However, immunocompromised hosts were excluded from these studies. We investigated outcomes of short (≤10 days), intermediate (11-14 days), and prolonged (≥15 days) antimicrobial durations for GN-BSI in neutropenic patients. A retrospective cohort study was conducted on neutropenic patients with monomicrobial GN-BSI between 2018 and 2022. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality and microbiologic relapse within 90 days after therapy completion. The secondary outcome was a composite of 90-day CDI and development of MDR-GN bacteria. Cox regression analysis with propensity score (PS) adjustment was used to compare outcomes between the three groups. A total of 206 patients were classified into short (n = 67), intermediate (n = 81), or prolonged (n = 58) duration. Neutropenia was predominantly secondary to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (48%) or hematologic malignancy (35%). The primary sources of infection included intra-abdominal (51%), vascular catheter (27%), and urinary (8%). Most patients received definitive therapy with cefepime or carbapenem. No significant difference in the primary composite endpoint was observed for intermediate versus short (PS-adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.89; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.39-2.03) or prolonged versus short therapy (PS-aHR 1.20; 95% CI 0.52-2.74). There was no significant difference in the secondary composite endpoint of CDI or MDR-GN emergence. Our data suggest that short antimicrobial courses had comparable 90-day outcomes as intermediate and prolonged regimens for GN-BSI among immunocompromised patients with neutropenia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 179 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 3 27%
Researcher 3 27%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 9%
Unknown 3 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 45%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 9%
Unknown 3 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 108. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2023.
All research outputs
#393,563
of 25,653,515 outputs
Outputs from Transplant Infectious Disease
#3
of 1,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,468
of 387,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Transplant Infectious Disease
#1
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,653,515 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,402 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 387,001 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.