You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Response-Adaptive Randomization in Clinical Trials: From Myths to Practical Considerations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Statistical Science, May 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1214/22-sts865 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David S. Robertson, Kim May Lee, Boryana C. López-Kolkovska, Sofía S. Villar |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| India | 1 | 11% |
| France | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
| Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 49 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 12% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 4% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 20 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematics | 12 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 24 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2023.
All research outputs
#6,570,243
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Statistical Science
#213
of 707 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,165
of 407,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Statistical Science
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 707 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 407,384 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them