↓ Skip to main content

Species Richness

Overview of attention for article published in BioScience, December 1987
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
161 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Species Richness
Published in
BioScience, December 1987
DOI 10.2307/1310544
Authors

J. Michael Scott, Blair Csuti, James D. Jacobi, John E. Estes

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 98 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 6%
Student > Bachelor 4 4%
Professor 3 3%
Student > Master 3 3%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 69 70%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 13%
Environmental Science 7 7%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Chemical Engineering 1 1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 70 71%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 1993.
All research outputs
#7,499,357
of 22,919,505 outputs
Outputs from BioScience
#1,739
of 2,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,577
of 49,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioScience
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,919,505 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,970 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.0. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 49,858 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.