You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A Formal Theory of Choreographic Programming
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Automated Reasoning, May 2023
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10817-023-09665-3 |
Authors |
Luís Cruz-Filipe, Fabrizio Montesi, Marco Peressotti |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 2 | 29% |
Ukraine | 1 | 14% |
Italy | 1 | 14% |
Denmark | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
Scientists | 2 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,118,990
of 23,983,331 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Automated Reasoning
#4
of 139 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,193
of 304,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Automated Reasoning
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,983,331 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 139 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,470 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them