↓ Skip to main content

Mental Health/Substance Abuse Treatment in Managed Care: the Massachusetts Medicaid Experience

Overview of attention for article published in Health Affairs, January 1995
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
4 policy sources

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Mental Health/Substance Abuse Treatment in Managed Care: the Massachusetts Medicaid Experience
Published in
Health Affairs, January 1995
DOI 10.1377/hlthaff.14.3.173
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Massachusetts was the first state to introduce a statewide specialty mental health managed care plan for its Medicaid program. This study assesses the impact of this program on expenditures, access, and relative quality. Over a one-year period, expenditures were reduced by 22 percent below predicted levels without managed care, without any overall reduction in access or relative quality. Reduced lengths-of-stay, lower prices, and fewer inpatient admissions were the major factors. However, for one population segment--children and adolescents--readmission rates increased slightly, and providers for this group were less satisfied than they were before managed care was adopted. Less costly types of twenty-four-hour care were substituted for inpatient hospital care. This experience supports the usefulness of a managed care program for mental health and substance abuse services, and the applicability of such a program to high-risk populations.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 18%
Researcher 7 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 11%
Other 4 9%
Student > Master 4 9%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 8 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 14 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 29%
Psychology 4 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 9 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2018.
All research outputs
#3,295,883
of 29,461,039 outputs
Outputs from Health Affairs
#3,765
of 6,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,763
of 86,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Affairs
#11
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,461,039 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,878 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.9. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 86,038 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.