You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Die „Fab15“ der NIS zum Polytrauma
|
---|---|
Published in |
Notfall + Rettungsmedizin, May 2023
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10049-023-01140-1 |
Authors |
Paula Beck, Janina Deyng, Tatjana Weimann, Christoph Güsgen, Konstantinos Meletiadis, Heiko Trentzsch, Gerrit Matthes, Christoph Wölfl |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 2 | 67% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2023.
All research outputs
#14,292,486
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Notfall + Rettungsmedizin
#131
of 636 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,109
of 388,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Notfall + Rettungsmedizin
#3
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 636 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 388,853 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.