↓ Skip to main content

The rise of hyperabundant native generalists threatens both humans and nature

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Reviews, June 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#20 of 1,590)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
31 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
116 X users

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The rise of hyperabundant native generalists threatens both humans and nature
Published in
Biological Reviews, June 2023
DOI 10.1111/brv.12985
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonathan H. Moore, Luke Gibson, Zachary Amir, Wirong Chanthorn, Abdul Hamid Ahmad, Patrick A. Jansen, Calebe P. Mendes, Manabu Onuma, Carlos A. Peres, Matthew Scott Luskin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 116 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 20%
Student > Master 6 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 20 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 29%
Environmental Science 13 23%
Computer Science 1 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 22 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 301. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2024.
All research outputs
#117,505
of 25,766,791 outputs
Outputs from Biological Reviews
#20
of 1,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,633
of 385,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Reviews
#2
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,766,791 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,590 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 385,711 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.