↓ Skip to main content

Chaotic Dynamics in an Insect Population

Overview of attention for article published in Science, January 1997
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
2 X users
reddit
2 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
395 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Chaotic Dynamics in an Insect Population
Published in
Science, January 1997
DOI 10.1126/science.275.5298.389
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

A nonlinear demographic model was used to predict the population dynamics of the flour beetle Tribolium under laboratory conditions and to establish the experimental protocol that would reveal chaotic behavior. With the adult mortality rate experimentally set high, the dynamics of animal abundance changed from equilibrium to quasiperiodic cycles to chaos as adult-stage recruitment rates were experimentally manipulated. These transitions in dynamics corresponded to those predicted by the mathematical model. Phase-space graphs of the data together with the deterministic model attractors provide convincing evidence of transitions to chaos.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 395 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 18 5%
Brazil 13 3%
France 6 2%
Switzerland 5 1%
Canada 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Argentina 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Other 9 2%
Unknown 333 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 101 26%
Researcher 81 21%
Student > Master 47 12%
Professor 37 9%
Student > Bachelor 26 7%
Other 70 18%
Unknown 33 8%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 202 51%
Environmental Science 80 20%
Mathematics 14 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 2%
Physics and Astronomy 8 2%
Other 27 7%
Unknown 56 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2025.
All research outputs
#5,920,011
of 31,895,487 outputs
Outputs from Science
#45,803
of 91,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,142
of 117,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#93
of 260 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,895,487 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 91,414 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.0. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 117,572 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 260 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.