↓ Skip to main content

EVALUATING THE OUTCOMES OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE THERAPY VS SURGERY FOR ORAL MUCOCELES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice, February 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
EVALUATING THE OUTCOMES OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE THERAPY VS SURGERY FOR ORAL MUCOCELES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
Published in
Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice, February 2023
DOI 10.1016/j.jebdp.2023.101841
Pubmed ID
Authors

Qiuhao Wang, Yuqi Wu, You Zhang, Zhenyu Zhang, Hao Xu, Yuchen Jiang, Xiaobo Luo

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2023.
All research outputs
#15,664,840
of 25,601,426 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice
#126
of 335 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,997
of 427,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,601,426 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 335 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,223 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.