↓ Skip to main content

Missing Information in Case Reports Related to Physical Therapy in Japan

Overview of attention for article published in Rigakuryoho Kagaku, June 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 299)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
20 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Missing Information in Case Reports Related to Physical Therapy in Japan
Published in
Rigakuryoho Kagaku, June 2023
DOI 10.1589/rika.38.188
Authors

Ryunosuke URATA, Marino SUZUKI, Masaki YAMAMOTO, ITO Shomaru, Kosuke SUZUKI, ITO Riyaka, ITO Akihiro, Shinno IIJIMA, Akihiro YAKABI, Akifumi SUZUKI, Tatsuya IGAWA

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2024.
All research outputs
#2,223,983
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Rigakuryoho Kagaku
#1
of 299 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,563
of 385,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Rigakuryoho Kagaku
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 299 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 385,277 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them