You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Clinical tests for confirming tracheal intubation or excluding oesophageal intubation: a diagnostic test accuracy systematic review and meta‐analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Anaesthesia, June 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1111/anae.16059 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
J. Hansel, J. A. Law, N. Chrimes, A. Higgs, T. M. Cook |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 261 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 45 | 17% |
| United States | 22 | 8% |
| Australia | 9 | 3% |
| India | 8 | 3% |
| Mexico | 6 | 2% |
| Canada | 6 | 2% |
| Japan | 4 | 2% |
| Singapore | 4 | 2% |
| Colombia | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 49 | 19% |
| Unknown | 105 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 198 | 76% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 39 | 15% |
| Scientists | 17 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 3 | 20% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 7% |
| Librarian | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 47% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 177. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 February 2024.
All research outputs
#233,029
of 25,782,229 outputs
Outputs from Anaesthesia
#101
of 5,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,043
of 375,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Anaesthesia
#2
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,229 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,158 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 375,527 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.