Prefrontal Cholinergic Mechanisms Instigating Shifts from Monitoring for Cues to Cue-Guided Performance: Converging Electrochemical and fMRI Evidence from Rats and Humans
We previously reported involvement of right prefrontal cholinergic activity in veridical signal detection. Here, we first recorded real-time acetylcholine release in prefrontal cortex (PFC) during specific trial sequences in rats performing a task requiring signal detection as well as rejection of nonsignal events. Cholinergic release events recorded with subsecond resolution ("transients") were observed only during signal-hit trials, not during signal-miss trials or nonsignal events. Moreover, cholinergic transients were not observed for consecutive hits; instead they were limited to signal-hit trials that were preceded by factual or perceived nonsignal events ("incongruent hits"). This finding suggests that these transients mediate shifts from a state of perceptual attention, or monitoring for cues, to cue-evoked activation of response rules and the generation of a cue-directed response. Next, to determine the translational significance of the cognitive operations supporting incongruent hits we used a version of the task previously validated for use in research in humans and blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD)-functional magnetic resonance imaging. Incongruent hits activated a region in the right rostral PFC (Brodmann area 10). Furthermore, greater prefrontal activation was correlated with faster response times for incongruent hits. Finally, we measured tissue oxygen in rats, as a proxy for BOLD, and found prefrontal increases in oxygen levels solely during incongruent hits. These cross-species studies link a cholinergic response to a prefrontal BOLD activation and indicate that these interrelated mechanisms mediate the integration of external cues with internal representations to initiate and guide behavior.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2013.
All research outputs
#24,782,047
of 34,400,738 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroscience
#19,077
of 23,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,030
of 241,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroscience
#278
of 358 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,400,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23,401 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,109 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 358 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
