↓ Skip to main content

Predictors of Ventricular Arrhythmias in Patients With Mitral Valve Prolapse: A Meta-analysis.

Overview of attention for article published in Cardiology in Review, June 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
18 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Predictors of Ventricular Arrhythmias in Patients With Mitral Valve Prolapse: A Meta-analysis.
Published in
Cardiology in Review, June 2023
DOI 10.1097/crd.0000000000000577
Pubmed ID
Authors

George Bazoukis, Athanasios Saplaouras, Konstantinos Vlachos, Panagiotis Mililis, Konstantinos P Letsas, Michael Efremidis, Tong Liu, Gary Tse

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2023.
All research outputs
#3,377,024
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Cardiology in Review
#55
of 651 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,818
of 379,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cardiology in Review
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 651 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 379,086 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them