You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Preparation and Evaluation of Coal-Derived Activated Carbons for Removal of Mercury Vapor from Simulated Coal Combustion Flue Gases
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Energy & Fuels, October 1998
|
| DOI | 10.1021/ef9801064 |
| Authors |
Hsing-Cheng Hsi, Shiaoguo Chen, Massoud Rostam-Abadi, Mark J. Rood, Carl F. Richardson, Todd R. Carey, Ramsay Chang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 11% |
| Unknown | 17 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 26% |
| Researcher | 3 | 16% |
| Professor | 3 | 16% |
| Librarian | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 11% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 7 | 37% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 11% |
| Chemical Engineering | 2 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 16% |
| Unknown | 3 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2009.
All research outputs
#4,728,388
of 22,919,505 outputs
Outputs from Energy & Fuels
#356
of 3,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,543
of 33,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Energy & Fuels
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,919,505 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,316 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 33,040 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them