You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Patterns of Apparent Extirpation among Isolated Populations of Pikas (Ochotona princeps) in the Great Basin
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Mammalogy, February 2003
|
DOI | 10.1644/1545-1542(2003)084<0037:poaeai>2.0.co;2 |
Authors |
Erik A. Beever, Peter F. Brussard, Joel Berger |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 229 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 12 | 5% |
Chile | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Czechia | 1 | <1% |
India | 1 | <1% |
Puerto Rico | 1 | <1% |
Belgium | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 211 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 52 | 23% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 18% |
Student > Master | 40 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 30 | 13% |
Other | 20 | 9% |
Other | 26 | 11% |
Unknown | 20 | 9% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 121 | 53% |
Environmental Science | 59 | 26% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 14 | 6% |
Engineering | 3 | 1% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | <1% |
Other | 7 | 3% |
Unknown | 23 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,324,463
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Mammalogy
#170
of 3,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,322
of 62,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Mammalogy
#3
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,460 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,068 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.