↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Dietary Flavonoids Modulate PCB-Induced Oxidative Stress, CYP1A1 Induction, and AhR-DNA Binding Activity in Vascular Endothelial Cells
Published in
Toxicological Sciences, August 2003
DOI 10.1093/toxsci/kfg227
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), especially the more coplanar PCBs, have been shown to induce oxidative stress, various transcription factors, and subsequent inflammatory processes critical to atherosclerosis in vascular endothelial cells. Dietary flavonoids such as catechins and quercetin possess antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties. To test the hypothesis that flavonoids can modify PCB-mediated endothelial cytotoxicity, endothelial cells were treated with epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG; 5 to 50 muM) or quercetin (10 to 100 muM) with or without PCB 77 (3,3',4,4'-tetrachlorobiphenyl, 3.4 muM) for 6 h. EGCG and quercetin strongly, and in a concentration-dependent manner, inhibited oxidative stress induced by PCB 77 as measured by DCF fluorescence. The role of cytochrome P450 1A1 (CYP1A1) in the PCB-induced toxicity was investigated. EGCG at 50 muM and quercetin at 100 muM concentrations markedly inhibited CYP1A1 mRNA levels and enzyme activity. Furthermore, EGCG and quercetin downregulated the PCB 77-mediated increase in aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR)-DNA binding activity. These data suggest that protective effects of EGCG and quercetin are initiated upstream from CYP1A1 and that these flavonoids may be of value for inhibiting the toxic effects of PCBs on vascular endothelial cells.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
India 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 45 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 21%
Student > Master 8 17%
Researcher 7 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 8 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 10%
Environmental Science 2 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 9 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2007.
All research outputs
#8,830,764
of 26,228,764 outputs
Outputs from Toxicological Sciences
#1,751
of 4,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,011
of 51,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Toxicological Sciences
#5
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,228,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,863 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 51,579 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.