↓ Skip to main content

RECOVERY OF LITTLE BROWN BATS (MYOTIS LUCIFUGUS) FROM NATURAL INFECTION WITH GEOMYCES DESTRUCTANS, WHITE-NOSE SYNDROME

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Wildlife Diseases, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
RECOVERY OF LITTLE BROWN BATS (MYOTIS LUCIFUGUS) FROM NATURAL INFECTION WITH GEOMYCES DESTRUCTANS, WHITE-NOSE SYNDROME
Published in
Journal of Wildlife Diseases, July 2011
DOI 10.7589/0090-3558-47.3.618
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carol Uphoff Meteyer, Mick Valent, Jackie Kashmer, Elizabeth L. Buckles, Jeffrey M. Lorch, David S. Blehert, Amanda Lollar, Douglas Berndt, Emily Wheeler, C. LeAnn White, Anne E. Ballmann

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 5%
Canada 2 1%
India 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 142 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 32 21%
Student > Master 30 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 13%
Student > Bachelor 18 12%
Other 18 12%
Other 22 14%
Unknown 15 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 85 54%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 10%
Environmental Science 15 10%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 9 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 1%
Other 10 6%
Unknown 19 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2018.
All research outputs
#1,363,302
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Wildlife Diseases
#52
of 1,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,697
of 127,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Wildlife Diseases
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,786 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,145 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.