You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effects of Nutrients and Hydroperiod on Typha, Cladium, and Eleocharis: Implications for Everglades Restoration
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecological Applications, August 1996
|
| DOI | 10.2307/2269482 |
| Authors |
S. Newman, J. B. Grace, J. W. Koebel |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 5% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 71 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 21% |
| Unknown | 9 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 40% |
| Environmental Science | 28 | 36% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 11 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2005.
All research outputs
#8,244,216
of 24,692,658 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Applications
#1,817
of 3,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,738
of 30,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Applications
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,692,658 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,334 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 30,180 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.