↓ Skip to main content

Holistic review in admissions: A strategy to diversify the nursing workforce

Overview of attention for article published in Nursing Outlook, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Holistic review in admissions: A strategy to diversify the nursing workforce
Published in
Nursing Outlook, January 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.outlook.2015.01.001
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Individuals both within and outside the nursing profession have called for more diversity in nursing, from the education arena to the workforce. Implementing initiatives that address diversity and determining their effects have been limited. The University of Illinois at Chicago College of Nursing used the American Association of Medical Colleges Holistic Review Project as a platform to implement a process and paradigm shift for admissions to its nursing programs. We believe that the use of holistic admissions can increase the diversity among nursing students and provide the first step toward a diversified nursing profession. In hopes of assisting other institutions, we describe our experiences with preparing and implementing a holistic admissions process within the context of lessons learned and continued challenges. Furthermore, we hope our efforts will serve as a catalyst for a national dialogue on the use of holistic review as a strategy for the development of a more diverse nursing workforce.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 1%
Unknown 67 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 10 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 12%
Student > Master 8 12%
Researcher 5 7%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 16 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 22 32%
Social Sciences 9 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 7%
Psychology 3 4%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 20 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2019.
All research outputs
#6,198,418
of 28,267,709 outputs
Outputs from Nursing Outlook
#257
of 1,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,689
of 370,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nursing Outlook
#5
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,267,709 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,045 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,296 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.