↓ Skip to main content

2023 ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension The Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Hypertension, September 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 5,075)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
32 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
1091 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
723 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
2023 ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension The Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension
Published in
Journal of Hypertension, September 2023
DOI 10.1097/hjh.0000000000003480
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giuseppe Mancia, Reinhold Kreutz, Mattias Brunström, Michel Burnier, Guido Grassi, Andrzej Januszewicz, Maria Lorenza Muiesan, Konstantinos Tsioufis, Enrico Agabiti-Rosei, Engi Abd Elhady Algharably, Michel Azizi, Athanase Benetos, Claudio Borghi, Jana Brguljan Hitij, Renata Cifkova, Antonio Coca, Veronique Cornelissen, J. Kennedy Cruickshank, Pedro G. Cunha, A.H. Jan Danser, Rosa Maria de Pinho, Christian Delles, Anna F. Dominiczak, Maria Dorobantu, Michalis Doumas, María S. Fernández-Alfonso, Jean-Michel Halimi, Zoltán Járai, Bojan Jelaković, Jens Jordan, Tatiana Kuznetsova, Stephane Laurent, Dragan Lovic, Empar Lurbe, Felix Mahfoud, Athanasios Manolis, Marius Miglinas, Krzystof Narkiewicz, Teemu Niiranen, Paolo Palatini, Gianfranco Parati, Atul Pathak, Alexandre Persu, Jorge Polonia, Josep Redon, Pantelis Sarafidis, Roland Schmieder, Bart Spronck, Stella Stabouli, George Stergiou, Stefano Taddei, Costas Thomopoulos, Maciej Tomaszewski, Philippe Van de Borne, Christoph Wanner, Thomas Weber, Bryan Williams, Zhen-Yu Zhang, Sverre E. Kjeldsen

Abstract

Luis Alcocer (Mexico), Christina Antza (Greece), Mustafa Arici (Turkey), Eduardo Barbosa (Brazil), Adel Berbari (Lebanon), Luís Bronze (Portugal), John Chalmers (Australia), Tine De Backer (Belgium), Alejandro de la Sierra (Spain), Kyriakos Dimitriadis (Greece), Dorota Drozdz (Poland), Béatrice Duly-Bouhanick (France), Brent M. Egan (USA), Serap Erdine (Turkey), Claudio Ferri (Italy), Anthony Heagerty (UK), Slavomira Filipova (Slovak Republic), Michael Hecht Olsen (Denmark), Dagmara Hering (Poland), Uday Jadhav (India), Manolis Kallistratos (Greece), Kazuomi Kario (Japan), Vasilios Kotsis (Greece), Adi Leiba (Israel), Patricio López-Jaramillo (Colombia), Hans-Peter Marti (Norway), Terry McCormack (UK), Paolo Mulatero (Italy), Dike B. Ojji (Nigeria), Sungha Park (South Korea), Priit Pauklin (Estonia), Sabine Perl (Austria), Arman Postadzhian (Bulgaria), Aleksander Prejbisz (Poland), Venkata Ram (India), Ramiro Sanchez (Argentina), Markus Schlaich (Australia), Alta Schutte (Australia), Cristina Sierra (Spain), Sekib Sokolovic (Bosnia and Herzegovina), Jonas Spaak (Sweden), Dimitrios Terentes-Printzios (Greece), Bruno Trimarco (Italy), Thomas Unger (The Netherlands), Bert-Jan van den Born (The Netherlands), Anna Vachulova (Slovak Republic), Agostino Virdis (Italy), Jiguang Wang (China), Ulrich Wenzel (Germany), Paul Whelton (USA), Jiri Widimsky (Czech Republic), Jacek Wolf (Poland), Grégoire Wuerzner (Switzerland), Eugene Yang (USA), Yuqing Zhang (China).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,091 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 723 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 723 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 88 12%
Student > Bachelor 64 9%
Other 50 7%
Researcher 50 7%
Student > Master 43 6%
Other 137 19%
Unknown 291 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 196 27%
Unspecified 99 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 41 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 14 2%
Other 50 7%
Unknown 306 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 916. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2024.
All research outputs
#19,097
of 25,807,758 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Hypertension
#3
of 5,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#450
of 358,890 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Hypertension
#2
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,807,758 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,075 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,890 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.