↓ Skip to main content

Child maltreatment: Testing the social isolation hypothesis

Overview of attention for article published in Child Abuse & Neglect, March 1996
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
5 policy sources

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Child maltreatment: Testing the social isolation hypothesis
Published in
Child Abuse & Neglect, March 1996
DOI 10.1016/s0145-2134(95)00143-3
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Several barriers limit our attempts to untangle the social context of child maltreatment. One major barrier is our inability to agree on or effectively communicate what social isolation is. In an attempt to clarify this construct, the introductory section traces the evolution of the social isolation construct over the last three decades and concludes it is not one etiologic factor for child maltreatment, but rather, a large set of variables linked to the parent's perception of support, and their informal and formal networks. The empirical section examines each component of the social isolation construct by comparing 300 maltreating and nonmaltreating low-income mothers. Considerable variation is found between the networks of different types of maltreating mothers and nonmaltreating mothers on structural network properties, perception of support, and the types of resources they do and do not receive. For example, neglectful mothers had fewer network members, fewer contacts, fewer members living within 1 hour, and received fewer emotional and instrumental resources. Despite these findings, the label "social isolation" may not accurately describe the networks of mothers who maltreat their children, since all three types of maltreaters had at least eight important network members and more than 100 contacts with these members in the month before completing the questionnaire.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 67 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 24%
Researcher 11 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Other 5 7%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 15 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 19 28%
Psychology 17 25%
Arts and Humanities 4 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 18 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2018.
All research outputs
#2,572,809
of 27,777,630 outputs
Outputs from Child Abuse & Neglect
#644
of 3,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,124
of 29,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Child Abuse & Neglect
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,777,630 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,735 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.