↓ Skip to main content

Exploring healthcare professionals' perspective of the process of obtaining consent for adult patient's having planned surgery: A scoping review

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Nursing, June 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#37 of 5,496)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
14 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exploring healthcare professionals' perspective of the process of obtaining consent for adult patient's having planned surgery: A scoping review
Published in
Journal of Clinical Nursing, June 2023
DOI 10.1111/jocn.16698
Pubmed ID
Authors

Therese M. Gardiner, Brigid M. Gillespie, Sharon Latimer, Jayne Hewitt

Abstract

The aim of this scoping review was to provide an overview of the literature about the process of obtaining consent from adult patients undergoing planned surgery from the healthcare professionals' perspective and analyse knowledge gaps. The process of obtaining consent for planned elective surgery manifests an individual's fundamental right to decide what happens to their body. The process is often suboptimal and problematic, placing a significant resource burden on health systems globally. Deficiencies in the documentation on consent forms have also been shown to increase the risk of operating room error. Scoping review. Arksey and O'Malley's (International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8, 2005 and 19) five-step scoping review methodology was used. Fifty-three articles were included; 39 primary and 14 secondary research publications. Three key findings were identified; there is currently low-level evidence about surgical consent processes to inform clinical practice; junior doctors obtain surgical consent frequently, yet this process was likely undertaken sub-optimally; and current knowledge gaps include capacity assessment, decision-making and pre-procedural consent checks. Planned surgical consent processes are complex, and both surgeons and perioperative nurses are essential during the process. While surgeons have responsibility to obtain consent, perioperative nurses provide a safety net in the surgical consent process checking the surgical consent information is correct and has been understood by the patient. Such actions may influence consent validity and patient safety in the operating room. Knowledge gaps about capacity assessment, decision-making, pre-procedural checks and the impact of junior doctors obtaining consent on patient understanding, safety and legal claims are evident. This review highlights the importance of the surgical nurse's role in the planned surgical consent process. While the responsibility for obtaining surgical consent lies with the surgeon, the nurse's role verifying consent information is crucial as they act as a safety net and can reduce error in the operating room. The authors declare that no patient or public contribution was made to this review in accordance with the aim to map existing literature from the healthcare professionals' perspective.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 20%
Other 1 10%
Student > Master 1 10%
Unknown 6 60%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 2 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 10%
Unknown 6 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 105. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2023.
All research outputs
#379,555
of 24,589,002 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Nursing
#37
of 5,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,634
of 353,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Nursing
#2
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,589,002 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,496 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,453 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.