You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
腰椎椎間板ヘルニア患者における坐骨神経硬度の術前後変化―剪断波エラストグラフィーを使用した調査―
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Musculoskeletal Physical Therapy, June 2023
|
| DOI | 10.57281/jofmpt.3.o-173 |
| Authors |
庄司 亮平, 伊藤 俊一, 遠藤 達矢, 佐藤 圭汰, 半谷 智辰, 岩渕 真澄, 白土 修 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2023.
All research outputs
#17,637,892
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Musculoskeletal Physical Therapy
#6
of 12 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#225,799
of 390,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Musculoskeletal Physical Therapy
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one scored the same or higher as 6 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 390,455 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them