You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Austrian consensus on the diagnosis and management of portal hypertension in advanced chronic liver disease (Billroth IV)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Acta Medica Austriaca, June 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00508-023-02229-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mattias Mandorfer, Elmar Aigner, Manfred Cejna, Arnulf Ferlitsch, Christian Datz, Tilmann Gräter, Ivo Graziadei, Michael Gschwantler, Stephanie Hametner-Schreil, Harald Hofer, Mathias Jachs, Alexander Loizides, Andreas Maieron, Markus Peck-Radosavljevic, Florian Rainer, Bernhard Scheiner, Georg Semmler, Lukas Reider, Silvia Reiter, Maria Schoder, Rainer Schöfl, Philipp Schwabl, Vanessa Stadlbauer, Rudolf Stauber, Elisabeth Tatscher, Michael Trauner, Alexander Ziachehabi, Heinz Zoller, Peter Fickert, Thomas Reiberger |
| Abstract |
The Billroth IV consensus was developed during a consensus meeting of the Austrian Society of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (ÖGGH) and the Austrian Society of Interventional Radiology (ÖGIR) held on the 26th of November 2022 in Vienna.Based on international recommendations and considering recent landmark studies, the Billroth IV consensus provides guidance regarding the diagnosis and management of portal hypertension in advanced chronic liver disease. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 55 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 6 | 11% |
| Austria | 4 | 7% |
| Ecuador | 3 | 5% |
| Peru | 3 | 5% |
| Mexico | 3 | 5% |
| Portugal | 2 | 4% |
| India | 2 | 4% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 25 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 40 | 73% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 16% |
| Scientists | 6 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 15% |
| Other | 2 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7 | 54% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 31% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,163,197
of 25,540,105 outputs
Outputs from Acta Medica Austriaca
#30
of 973 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,595
of 376,182 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Medica Austriaca
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,540,105 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 973 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 376,182 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.