↓ Skip to main content

Does the vorticity flux from Agulhas rings control the zonal pathway of NADW across the South Atlantic?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Geophysical Research, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Does the vorticity flux from Agulhas rings control the zonal pathway of NADW across the South Atlantic?
Published in
Journal of Geophysical Research, May 2012
DOI 10.1029/2011jc007684
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 3%
South Africa 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 91 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 28%
Researcher 19 19%
Student > Master 14 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 4%
Professor 4 4%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 20 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 53 54%
Environmental Science 10 10%
Physics and Astronomy 8 8%
Engineering 3 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 23 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2021.
All research outputs
#3,503,396
of 34,359,530 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Geophysical Research
#1,113
of 16,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,304
of 215,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Geophysical Research
#40
of 238 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,359,530 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,593 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 215,379 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 238 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.