↓ Skip to main content

Gulf Stream Cold-Core Rings: Their Physics, Chemistry, and Biology

Overview of attention for article published in Science, June 1981
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Gulf Stream Cold-Core Rings: Their Physics, Chemistry, and Biology
Published in
Science, June 1981
DOI 10.1126/science.212.4499.1091
Pubmed ID
Authors

The Ring Group

Abstract

Cyclonic Gulf Stream rings are energetic eddies in the warm Sargasso Sea consisting of a ring of Gulf Stream water surrounding a core of cold Slope Water. Initially a ring core has the characteristics of the Slope Water; it is rich in plants, animals, and nutrients. As a ring decays the Slope Water properties of its core are gradually replaced by those of the Sargasso Sea, where standing crops of plants, animals, and nutrients generally are low. Although the decay rate suggests a rather long lifetime (2 to 4 years), the usual death of a ring comes when it rejoins the Gulf Stream after 6 to 12 months.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Trinidad and Tobago 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Chile 1 1%
Unknown 67 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 26%
Researcher 15 20%
Other 5 7%
Student > Master 5 7%
Professor 4 5%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 14 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 30 41%
Environmental Science 13 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 14%
Computer Science 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 13 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2023.
All research outputs
#5,714,724
of 26,265,706 outputs
Outputs from Science
#43,443
of 82,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#684
of 6,428 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#28
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,265,706 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 82,785 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.6. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 6,428 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.