↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
What happens when you add salt: predicting impacts of secondary salinisation on shallow aquatic ecosystems by using an alternative-states model
Published in
Australian Journal of Botany, December 2003
DOI 10.1071/bt02117
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Australia 3 4%
United States 2 3%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 72 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 18%
Student > Bachelor 13 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 13%
Student > Master 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 14 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 22 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 28%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 8%
Engineering 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 19 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2011.
All research outputs
#10,291,846
of 29,686,237 outputs
Outputs from Australian Journal of Botany
#218
of 803 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,260
of 162,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Australian Journal of Botany
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,686,237 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 803 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 162,946 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.