↓ Skip to main content

The spontaneous mouse mutant low set ears (Lse) is caused by tandem duplication of Fgf3 and Fgf4

Overview of attention for article published in Mammalian Genome, June 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The spontaneous mouse mutant low set ears (Lse) is caused by tandem duplication of Fgf3 and Fgf4
Published in
Mammalian Genome, June 2023
DOI 10.1007/s00335-023-09999-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alana Luzzio, Sarah Edie, Kristina Palmer, L. Brianna Caddle, Rachel Urban, Leslie O. Goodwin, Ian C. Welsh, Laura G. Reinholdt, David E. Bergstrom, Timothy C. Cox, Leah Rae Donahue, Stephen A. Murray

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2023.
All research outputs
#6,591,459
of 24,079,362 outputs
Outputs from Mammalian Genome
#274
of 1,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,284
of 263,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mammalian Genome
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,079,362 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,147 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,781 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them