You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Impact of Imprinted Immunity Induced by mRNA Vaccination in an Experimental Animal Model
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Infectious Diseases, June 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1093/infdis/jiad230 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shigeru Fujita, Keiya Uriu, Lin Pan, Naganori Nao, Koshiro Tabata, Mai Kishimoto, Yukari Itakura, Hirofumi Sawa, Izumi Kida, Tomokazu Tamura, Yu Kaku, Naoko Misawa, Arnon Plianchaisuk, Ziyi Guo, Alfredo A Hinay, Jarel Elgin M Tolentino, Luo Chen, Mai Suganami, Mika Chiba, Ryo Yoshimura, Kyoko Yasuda, Keiko Iida, Naomi Ohsumi, Adam P Strange, Shiho Tanaka, Rigel Suzuki, Saori Suzuki, Hayato Ito, Shinya Tanaka, Masumi Tsuda, Lei Wang, Yoshikata Oda, Zannatul Ferdous, Kenji Shishido, Kenji Sadamasu, Kazuhisa Yoshimura, Hiroyuki Asakura, Isao Yoshida, Mami Nagashima, So Nakagawa, Kotaro Shirakawa, Akifumi Takaori-Kondo, Kayoko Nagata, Ryosuke Nomura, Yoshihito Horisawa, Yusuke Tashiro, Yugo Kawai, Kazuo Takayama, Rina Hashimoto, Sayaka Deguchi, Yukio Watanabe, Ayaka Sakamoto, Naoko Yasuhara, Takao Hashiguchi, Tateki Suzuki, Kanako Kimura, Jiei Sasaki, Yukari Nakajima, Hisano Yajima, Takashi Irie, Ryoko Kawabata, Kaori Tabata, Terumasa Ikeda, Hesham Nasser, Ryo Shimizu, MST Monira Begum, Michael Jonathan, Yuka Mugita, Otowa Takahashi, Kimiko Ichihara, Takamasa Ueno, Chihiro Motozono, Mako Toyoda, Akatsuki Saito, Maya Shofa, Yuki Shibatani, Tomoko Nishiuchi, Takasuke Fukuhara, Jumpei Ito, Keita Matsuno, Kei Sato |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,110 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 227 | 20% |
| United States | 22 | 2% |
| Canada | 11 | <1% |
| France | 8 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | <1% |
| Austria | 6 | <1% |
| Australia | 5 | <1% |
| Poland | 4 | <1% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 38 | 3% |
| Unknown | 779 | 70% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1060 | 95% |
| Scientists | 32 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 15 | 1% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 1 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 25% |
| Engineering | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 672. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2024.
All research outputs
#32,223
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Infectious Diseases
#34
of 14,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#850
of 378,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Infectious Diseases
#2
of 149 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,922 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 378,077 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 149 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.