You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Success rate of permanent teeth pulpotomy using bioactive materials: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized clinical trials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Endodontic Journal, June 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1111/iej.13939 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emmanuel J. N. L. Silva, Karem P. Pinto, Felipe G. Belladonna, Claudio M. A. Ferreira, Marco A. Versiani, Gustavo De‐Deus |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
| Researcher | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 12 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 47% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 9 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2023.
All research outputs
#6,289,447
of 23,964,824 outputs
Outputs from International Endodontic Journal
#146
of 1,061 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,677
of 237,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Endodontic Journal
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,964,824 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,061 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,048 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them