↓ Skip to main content

Selecting Agonists from Single Cells Infected with Combinatorial Antibody Libraries

Overview of attention for article published in Chemistry & Biology, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
patent
13 patents

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Selecting Agonists from Single Cells Infected with Combinatorial Antibody Libraries
Published in
Chemistry & Biology, May 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.chembiol.2013.04.012
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We describe a system for direct selection of antibodies that are receptor agonists. Combinatorial antibody libraries in lentiviruses are used to infect eukaryotic cells that contain a fluorescent reporter system coupled to the receptor for which receptor agonist antibodies are sought. In this embodiment of the method, very large numbers of candidate antibodies expressing lentivirus and eukaryotic reporter cells are packaged together in a format where each is capable of replication, thereby forging a direct link between genotype and phenotype. Following infection, cells that fluoresce are sorted and the integrated genes encoding the agonist antibodies recovered. We validated the system by illustrating its ability to generate rapidly potent antibody agonists that are complete thrombopoietin phenocopies. The system should be generalizable to any pathway where its activation can be linked to production of a selectable phenotype.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Sweden 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 63 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 37%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 15%
Student > Master 9 14%
Other 6 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 5 8%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 23%
Chemistry 5 8%
Engineering 5 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 5%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 7 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2026.
All research outputs
#2,086,750
of 27,781,301 outputs
Outputs from Chemistry & Biology
#69
of 1,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,078
of 210,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chemistry & Biology
#4
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,781,301 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,385 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,598 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.