↓ Skip to main content

Where are we now with European forest multi-taxon biodiversity and where can we head to?

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Conservation, August 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Where are we now with European forest multi-taxon biodiversity and where can we head to?
Published in
Biological Conservation, August 2023
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110176
Authors

Sabina Burrascano, Francesco Chianucci, Giovanni Trentanovi, Sebastian Kepfer-Rojas, Tommaso Sitzia, Flóra Tinya, Inken Doerfler, Yoan Paillet, Thomas Andrew Nagel, Bozena Mitic, Lourdes Morillas, Silvana Munzi, Theo Van der Sluis, Edoardo Alterio, Lorenzo Balducci, Rafael Barreto de Andrade, Christophe Bouget, Paolo Giordani, Thibault Lachat, Dinka Matosevic, Francesca Napoleone, Juri Nascimbene, Chiara Paniccia, Nicolas Roth, Réka Aszalós, Gediminas Brazaitis, Andrea Cutini, Ettore D'Andrea, Pallieter De Smedt, Jacob Heilmann-Clausen, Philippe Janssen, Daniel Kozák, Anders Mårell, Martin Mikoláš, Björn Nordén, Radim Matula, Peter Schall, Miroslav Svoboda, Mariana Ujhazyova, Kris Vandekerkhove, Michael Wohlwend, Fotios Xystrakis, Michele Aleffi, Christian Ammer, Frederic Archaux, Thomas Asbeck, Dimitrios Avtzis, Manfred Ayasse, Simonetta Bagella, Rosario Balestrieri, Anna Barbati, Marco Basile, Ariel Bergamini, Giada Bertini, Alessandro Bruno Biscaccianti, Steffen Boch, János Bölöni, Pierluigi Bombi, Yves Boscardin, Giorgio Brunialti, Hans Henrik Bruun, François Buscot, David Bille Byriel, Thomas Campagnaro, Alessandro Campanaro, Matthieu Chauvat, Michał Ciach, Marek Čiliak, Luca Cistrone, Joao Manuel Cordeiro Pereira, Rolf Daniel, Bruno De Cinti, Gabriele De Filippo, Wouter Dekoninck, Umberto Di Salvatore, Yann Dumas, Zoltán Elek, Fabrizio Ferretti, Dimitrios Fotakis, Tamás Frank, Julian Frey, Carmen Giancola, Erika Gomoryová, Marion Gosselin, Frederic Gosselin, Martin M. Gossner, Frank Götmark, Elena Haeler, Aslak Kappel Hansen, Lionel Hertzog, Jeňýk Hofmeister, Jan Hošek, Vivian Kvist Johannsen, Mathias Just Justensen, Nathalie Korboulewsky, Bence Kovács, Ferenc Lakatos, Carlos Miguel Landivar, Luc Lens, Emanuele Lingua, Fabio Lombardi, František Máliš, Luca Marchino, Vitas Marozas, Giorgio Matteucci, Walter Mattioli, Peter Friis Møller, Jörg Müller, Csaba Németh, Gábor Ónodi, Francesco Parisi, Thomas Perot, Sandrine Perret, Anna Maria Persiani, Alessia Portaccio, Mario Posillico, Žydrūnas Preikša, Carsten Rahbek, Nolan James Rappa, Sonia Ravera, Antonio Romano, Ferenc Samu, Christoph Scheidegger, Inger Kappel Schmidt, Sebastian Schwegmann, Flavia Sicuriello, Andreea Petronela Spinu, Gavriil Spyroglou, Jonas Stillhard, Eleni Topalidou, Anders P. Tøttrup, Karol Ujházy, Katalin Veres, Kris Verheyen, Wolfgang W. Weisser, Livia Zapponi, Péter Ódor

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 97 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Student > Master 6 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 4%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 38 39%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 24%
Environmental Science 18 19%
Unspecified 3 3%
Linguistics 3 3%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 45 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2023.
All research outputs
#4,190,684
of 28,946,126 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#2,724
of 7,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,795
of 374,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#52
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,946,126 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,447 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,889 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.