↓ Skip to main content

Foreign news, regime type, and framing of China: comparing the world’s media interpretations of the Hong Kong National Security Law

Overview of attention for article published in Chinese Journal of Communication, June 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#42 of 174)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Foreign news, regime type, and framing of China: comparing the world’s media interpretations of the Hong Kong National Security Law
Published in
Chinese Journal of Communication, June 2023
DOI 10.1080/17544750.2023.2214741
Authors

Ying-ho Kwong, Mathew Y. H. Wong

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 33%
Researcher 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 33%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2023.
All research outputs
#6,152,852
of 23,988,888 outputs
Outputs from Chinese Journal of Communication
#42
of 174 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,329
of 275,179 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chinese Journal of Communication
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,988,888 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 174 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,179 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.