↓ Skip to main content

Real time functional MRI training to decrease motion in imaging studies: Lack of significant improvement.

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Real time functional MRI training to decrease motion in imaging studies: Lack of significant improvement.
Published in
Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, December 2016
DOI 10.1521/bumc.2016.80.4.348
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is widely used to study brain circuitry in healthy controls and in psychiatry. A major problem of fMRI studies is motion, which affects the quality of images, is a major source of noise, and can confound data if, for example, the experimental groups move differently. Despite continual reminders to experimental subjects about keeping still, however, movement in the scanner remains a problem. The authors hypothesized that showing head movement during a scanning session may help subjects learn how to keep their head still. The authors scanned subjects and displayed in real time a plot of head movement that had three regions. The authors found, in a limited sample, that the improvements were marginal and inconsistent. Thus, they concluded that this strategy, even if likely to work for some people, is probably not sufficiently successful to be implemented at this time.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 18%
Researcher 3 18%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 18%
Student > Bachelor 2 12%
Student > Master 2 12%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 4 24%
Psychology 3 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Computer Science 1 6%
Other 3 18%
Unknown 4 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2016.
All research outputs
#20,660,571
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic
#139
of 185 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#313,409
of 416,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 185 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 416,468 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.