↓ Skip to main content

Ionic Liquids with Symmetric Diether Tails: Bulk and Vacuum-Liquid Interfacial Structures

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Physical Chemistry B, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Ionic Liquids with Symmetric Diether Tails: Bulk and Vacuum-Liquid Interfacial Structures
Published in
Journal of Physical Chemistry B, December 2016
DOI 10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b09148
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The behavior in the bulk and at interfaces of biphilic ionic liquids in which either the cation or anion possesses moderately long alkyl tails is to a significant degree well understood. Less clear is what happens when both the cation and anion possess tails that are not apolar, such as in the case of ether functionalities. The current article discusses the structural characteristics of C2OC2OC2-mim(+)/C2OC2OC2-OSO3(-) in the bulk and at the vacuum interface. We find that the vacuum interface affects only the nanometer length scale. This is in contrast to what we have recently found in ( J. Phys. Chem. Lett. , 2016 , 7 ( 19 ), 3785 - -3790 ) for isoelectronic C[8]-mim(+)/C[8]-OSO3(-), where the interface effect is long ranged. Interestingly, ions with the diether tail functionality still favor the tail-outward orientation at the vacuum interface and the bulk phase preserves the alternation between charged networks and tails that is commonly observed for biphilic ionic liquids. However, such alternation is less well-defined and results in a significantly diminished first sharp diffraction peak in the bulk liquid structure function.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 5%
Unknown 20 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 29%
Researcher 6 29%
Student > Master 2 10%
Unspecified 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 3 14%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 14 67%
Physics and Astronomy 2 10%
Unspecified 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%
Unknown 3 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2016.
All research outputs
#28,604,603
of 34,364,397 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Physical Chemistry B
#13,499
of 17,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#364,598
of 460,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Physical Chemistry B
#110
of 273 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,364,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,741 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 460,191 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 273 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.